By Mattias Karlsson, Vice President eSite, Flexenclosure
With generators powering most of the telecom sites in Africa and other developing regions, diesel is the number one factor driving operational cost. Obvious questions result: How much diesel is any given site actually consuming? When is it time to refill? Is fuel consumption in line with the expected performance of your installed power solution? Is there an issue with theft? And are you benefiting from your investment in hybrid power systems in terms of overall fuel consumption?
These are clearly critical questions. But fuel monitoring is a complex process with a great number of factors affecting performance, reliability and accuracy and until recently diesel consumption has been the single most difficult factor to accurately measure at telecom sites. The good news is that reliable fuel monitoring systems are now available, but before you invest here are some key areas to discuss with any potential vendor:
1. Design
Any fuel monitoring system should be able to detect what is actually happening to the diesel, but without careful design it’s almost impossible to distinguish between legitimate fuel use or whether diesel is being stolen or if the tank is leaking. The system should be able to identify when a sensor is faulty or has been tampered with. Beyond the monitoring system itself, the design of the fuel tank setup on site can also introduce complications if, for example, fuel is moved between multiple tanks. And the design should also be able to make allowances for local temperature variations that will impact fuel measurements.
2. Installation and Maintenance
Even the most advanced system in the world will not provide useful or accurate data if it has not been installed correctly. The greater the installation complexity or sensor calibrations required, the greater the risk of errors and unreliable data, so the installation process needs to be as simple and straightforward as possible – especially as most telecom sites requiring a hybrid power system will likely be in remote and/or extreme environments. Post-
3. Accuracy
A competent fuel monitoring system clearly needs to be accurate, but accurate about what? Is it necessary to know exactly how many decilitres there are in the tank? Is that even feasible given that fluctuations in tank dimensions, external temperature and diesel density will all significantly affect a fuel reading? Rather than knowing the volume of diesel in a tank at any given moment in time, it is far more important to accurately know how much diesel has been consumed over time; how much has been refilled; whether any has been stolen; and most importantly – how many days’ worth of diesel is left at each site so that refuelling trips can be scheduled appropriately.
4. Reliability
Of course it goes without saying that any remote monitoring system needs to be reliable. Ideally though there should be an additional level of intelligence in the system, with smart software that is able to recognise patterns of behaviour at each site, such that educated decisions can be made as to whether an anomalous reading is a result of a real issue or whether it is more likely a sensor malfunction. In this way alarms can be prioritised and responded to with a greater measure of efficiency and control.
5. Remote Monitoring
There are obvious impracticalities in a system that requires local data collection by an engineer, especially when there are tens, hundreds or perhaps even thousands of sites involved. And with fuel planning in particular, any system which only allows sensor interrogation at a local level will obviously not be able to inform on issues that require immediate response such as increased diesel use due to a fuel leak or generator fault.
The ability to remotely monitor each and every site is therefore a given. Sophisticated hybrid power systems such as Flexenclosure’s eSite have fully integrated management tools that enable an engineer sitting in the NOC to compile accurate data and create real-time reports to make sense of fuel consumption (and myriad other data points) from an unlimited number of sites.
With a well-designed, accurate and reliable fuel monitoring system in place, meaningful performance improvements and operational cost reductions can be achieved. Network outages due to lack of fuel can be entirely eliminated. Site refuelling and generator maintenance can be scheduled far more efficiently. The analysis of fuel consumption versus generated electricity will allow the detection of low-performing gensets and provide the required data for a repair/replacement decision. And rather than being limited to simply evaluating site performance based on genset runtime, the overall efficiency of your hybrid power systems can be evaluated against the return on investment originally promised by the system vendor.
The benefits of understanding fuel use on a site-by-site basis are therefore clear. When multiplying those benefits across an entire network of hundreds or even thousands of telecom sites, the operational improvements and cost savings can be transformative to a business.
Mattias Karlsson
Mattias Karlsson is Vice President eSite at Flexenclosure, a designer and manufacturer of prefabricated data centre buildings and intelligent power management systems for the ICT industry. For the past five years he has been in charge of the development of Flexenclosure’s award winning green power management solution eSite. Mr. Karlsson has over 20 years of experience from electrical and automatization projects, mainly in the process and renewable areas. As both a designer and a project manager, he has a wide experience of evaluating and designing options for both on and off-grid power systems. See www.flexenclosure.com.
